Samedi 19 janvier 2008

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.

 Another myth of the Little Bighorn 

CUSTER AND 
TULLOCKS CREEK

vahlala.jpg

source: Colonel William Graham, The Custer Myth, page 131


In the movie "Son of the Morning Star", as well as in many articles and books, it is said that Custer neglected to scout Tullocks Creek and gave therefore a proof that he wanted to speed his regiment up and gain a victory for himself.

Scouting Tullocks Creek was noted in General Terry's orders:

"The Department Commander desires that on your way up the Rosebud you should thoroughly examine the upper part of Tullock's Creek"

Did Custer neglect this order? No. Tullocks Creek had his full attention.

Lieutenant Godfrey: "
The march during the day was tedious. We made many long halts, so as not to get ahead of the scouts, who seemed to be doing their work thoroughly, giving special attention to the right, toward Tulloch's Creek, the valley of which was in general view from the divide. Once or twice signal smokes were reported in that direction, but investigation did not confirm the reports."

The "Tullocks Creek controversy" was another hoax to push the "Custer the Reckless commander" agenda.

custer119o.jpg (11292 bytes)

Jeudi 22 novembre 2007

Mexican General Santa Anna's spurs were used by Custer at Little Bighorn
FROM THE ALAMO TO CUSTER'S LAST STAND
source: Norfolk Historical Society
 

The Huger spur was crafted of steel, probably in the 1840s, with a gold-inlaid band intricately engraved with trailing vines. The multi-spoked rowel, or wheel, is renderd as a flower, with the petals forming the points on the spur. Although its origin is unknown, it was most likely made in Mexico or Cuba, where its first owner, Mexican general Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna (the enemy of Davy Crockett at The Alamo), was living in exile before the Mexican-American War. The first documented account of the Huger spur dates from September 1847 after Santa Anna's defeat at the hands of General Winfield Scott In Mexico City. Santa Anna surrendered his sword to Scott, who, in a gesture of respect, promptly returned it. To show his appreciation, Santa Anna removed his spurs and presented them to Scott. Soon thereafter, Scott gave them to his chief of ordnance and artillery, Captan Benjamin Huger, for bravery at Vera Cruz, Molino del Rey, and Chapultepec.  

 

Davy Crockett (Billy Bob Thornton) in the movie "The Alamo" (2004)

The Huger spur

Huger gave the spurs to his son Frank on his graduation from West Point. The following year both Hugers resigned their commissions in the United Staes Army to serve Virginia and the Confederacy. The elder Huger commanded state forces in Norfolk and eventually gained promotion to major general. Frank Huger fought with the Norfolk Light Artillery, known as Huger's Battery, and quickly moved up in the ranks after service in the battles of the Seven Days, Sulphur Springs, Harpers Ferry, and Fredericksburg. In 1863 he was promoted to major and fought at Chancellorsville and Gettysburg. By the end of that year, he was a colonel in command of his own battalion. He was captured at Saylor's Creek in April 1865 by General George Armstrong Custer, a friend from West Point. Knowing that the war was over for him, the Virginian lent his prized spurs to the flamboyant Federal officer.

Some months after the war, Custer wrote to Huger asking permission to keep the spurs a little longer. Huger agreed, and Custer took the spurs when he went out west to fight in the Indian campaigns from which he never returned. One of the spurs was reportedly recovered from Custer's body after the Battle of Little Big Horn and given to his widow, Elizabeth, who then returned the spur to Frank Huger.

Personal papers and manuscripts that document the travels of the Huger spur lend credence to its seemingly fantastic history.

 

Mardi 9 octobre 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.
Three columns had to hunt Indians in 1876. But George Crook's 1'300 soldiers lost ten men at the battle of the Rosebud and then fell back to... go fishing on the Yellowston river.

GEORGE CROOK'S DUTY
Mary Trotter Kion, Suite101 


Two major battles took place in the west during June of 1876. The latter fight was the Battle of the Little Bighorn where Custer met his demise.

 The first battle took place along the banks of the upper Rosebud.

 General George Crook was the leading star of this show with some 1000 troops (1'300 with the scouts, n. custerwest). That sounds like a fairly reasonable number of men to insure a success over a band of Indians, and well it might have been. But Crook made a major error early on. He split his forces, sending one half on their merry way downstream along the Rosebud to locate and destroy a Cheyenne village believed to be camped in the area.

This tactic might have been successful except while one half of Crook’s forces were attacking the Indian village an even larger group of Cheyenne and Sioux attack Crook’s camp (Crazy Horse's men, the ones who would battle Custer one week later, n. custerwest). It didn’t take Crook long to realize that he was not only out-numbered (He was not. There were 750 warriors, n. custerwest), but also out flanked. Escape back to their base camp at Big Goose Creek became the plan of the day in no time at all for Crook and his men (casualties: 10 dead, 21 wounded. Indians didn't control the battlefield, n. custerwest).

Since Crook’s men failed to win a victory over the Indians it was decide to take on a lesser foe—the fish that were camped in Big Goose Creek. For two weeks, during which time the Battle of the Little Bighorn raged and was lost, Crook’s men counted coup on a band of trout.

Crook’s men had done a little fishing in this creek prior to being bested at Rosebud, but now the angling began in earnest. Records were kept of the amounts of fish caught and the methods for catching them by Crook’s aid de camp Captain John Bourke. It seems that artificial flies and fishing lines that had been brought in personal kits were used by the men. There is no mention of bamboo rods or fishing reels being used. The record amount of fish caught in any given day was claimed by Captain Anson Mills with 146 trout taken the same day Generals Gibbon and Terry were rescuing survivors of the Little Bighorn.

Also recorded was the weather. It is noted by the source of this article, recorded below, that the same hot weather that bloated the bodies left at the Battle of the Little Bighorn also brought on an extreme hatch of grasshoppers in Wyoming. In addition, the Indians who decamped after the Little Bighorn affair, while heading back to the Black Hills, set fire to the prairie. The fire drove the grasshoppers before it, right towards Goose Creek. This invasion got the attention of the trout and provided a profusion of live bate for the angling soldiers. 

Up to this point flyfishing had met with mild success, then the fish only had eyes for the grasshoppers, refusing any artificial inducements to take the bite.

While the soldiers fished some 100 Shoshone warriors who had come over from Wind River country to count coups on their Cheyenne and Sioux enemies hung around and watched. After a while the Shoshone offered to show the soldiers how this catching of fish should be done—on horseback.

The Indians piled brush across the creek, making a sort of weir. A few Indians stayed there while some half-dozen rode downstream. From that point they suddenly came charging up the creek, abreast and lashing the water with coup sticks and lances.

To the amazement of the soldiers, hundreds of trout fled upstream until the brush damn halted their flight. Now it was a simple matter of plucking the fish from the water and flinging them up on the bank.

And that, a Shoshone informed Bourke, was how real men caught fish. 

Lundi 9 juillet 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.

WHAT CUSTER WORE

Sources: The Custer Myth: A Source Book of Custerania, edited by Colonel W.A. Graham, The Stackpole Books, , pages 342 - 343


"General Custer carried a Remington Sporting rifle, octagonal barrel; two Bulldog selfcocking, English, white-handled pistols, with a ring in the butt for a lanyard; a hunting knife, in a beaded fringed scabbard; and a canvas cartridge belt. He wore a whitish gray hat, with broad brim and rather low crown, very similar to the Cowboy hat; buck skin suit, with a fringed welt in outer seams of trousers and arms of blouse; the blouse with double-breasted military buttons, lapels generally open; turn-down collar, and fringe on bottom of shirt. Captain Tom Custer was dressed about the same as the General. "

Lieutenant Edward Godfrey

"Custer was mounted on his sorrel horse and it being a very hot day he was in his shirt sleeves; his buckskin pants tucked into his boots; his buckskin shirt fastened to the rear of his saddle; and a broad brimmed cream colored hat on his head, the brim of which was turned up on the right side and fastened by a small hook and eye to its crown. This gave him opportunity to sight his rifle while riding. His rifle lay horizontally in front of him; when riding he leaned slightly forward. This was the appearance of Custer on the day that he entered his last battle, and just one half hour before the fight commenced between him and the Sioux . When the Crow scout left him, he wheeled around and made for the same point in the river where we had first seen him. When he was passing us he slightly checked his horse and waved his right hand twice for us to follow him. He pointed down the stream, put spurs to his horse and disappeared at the ford, never uttering a word. That was the last I ever saw of Custer alive."

Private Peter Thompson
 

custer9n.jpg (31754 bytes) 

LITTLE BIGHORN CAMPAIGN

Lundi 18 juin 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.

VARNUM: THE LAST MORNING

source: The Custer Myth by Colonel W.A. Graham, pages 342 - 343

Lieutenant Charles Varnum was the chief of scouts at the Little Bighorn. Here is one of his personal letter, written on July 4, 1876., about the morning before the battle. 

Early on the morning of the third day (June 25, 1876), we got on a very heavy trail going up the Rosebud. About ten miles from camp we found a circle surrounded by a brush fence arranged for a sun-dance, a description of which I have given you before, for making warriors. We found a stick with a fresh scalp attached and the trail of two or three Indians, evidently made that morning. We marched twenty miles, and then I was sent back six to examine a creek to see if any Indians had left the trail, and on my return we started again and made eight miles more, and camped in an Indian camp about two days old. The signs indicated an immense force, and we were in a hurry to take them by surprise. Custer came over to see the scouts. Six Crows with us, who knew the country well, said that the trail from here led on towards the Little Horn, a fork of the Bighorn, and they wanted to go ahead about twenty miles to a high bluff from which the valley of the Little Horn could be seen. Custer wanted some intelligent white man to go ahead with them to send him information. I took the six Crows, five Rees, and a white man, who was an old frontiersman, and we marched all night, making about sixty miles. I had rode without rest or any sleep for thirty-six hours. 
 
Custer said he would start at 11 p. m., and come somewhere near us by morning. At 2:30 o'clock we reached the hill, and lay there in scrub bushes until daybreak, when we discovered the smoke of a village, and by 5 a. m., I started the Rees back with a dispatch to General Custer. The Crows said there were about two or three thousand ponies on the plain twelve miles off, but I could not see them, as their eyes were better than mine. Custer had come ahead, and we could see his camp about eight miles off. He got my dispatch at 8 a. m., and started again and came to the hill.
In the meantime two Sioux were seen going in the direction of Custer's column. Charley Reynolds, myself, the Crow interpreter and two Crows started out to kill them, and prevent Custer being discovered. We failed to do it, however, and when Custer came up we informed him of the state of affairs, and he concluded, as we were discovered, to hurry up and strike them as soon as possible.

LITTLE BIGHORN CAMPAIGN

Mercredi 13 juin 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.

The controversy that proved General Miles was right
MAR(IA) ADAM'S AFFIDAVIT
70-2-mrandmrsandeliza.jpg Maria Adams was Custer's black servant, like Eliza (in the picture) before her.

 After the battle of the Little Bighorn, General Terry stated that Custer had disobeyed orders. Many military officers pointed out that his written orders were clearly giving Custer "carte blanche", but the story went on. 
In 1898, when General Miles published his Memoirs, he added the testimony of "Mary Adams", Custer's black servant at the Little Bighorn. Adams had heard General Terry himself telling Custer, on the night of June 21, that he could follow his own judgment if he found Indians.

Colonel Graham, in his book "The Custer Myth", said that Miles was lying, because Mary Adams had never existed. There wasn't any "Mary Adams" who was following Custer. This controversy became known as the "Mary Adams affidavit", used to discredit US General in chief Miles, who was accusing Captain Benteen and Major Reno of betrayal.
 
But General Miles wasn't lying. Recent studies showed that MARIA Adams, Mary's sister, was following Custer at Little Bighorn. It was her testimony that Miles had heard and put in his book.
 
The whole story had been true since the beginning.

LITTLE BIGHORN CAMPAIGN

Mercredi 30 mai 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.
WHAT THE SCOUTS
 
REALLY SAID
 
 
Wonderful artwork by Michael Schreck, http://michaelschreckart.com

In the traditional account of the battle, one depicts Indian scouts warning Custer of a suicidal attack.

In fact, it never happened that way. It is a myth, built by Benteen and Reno to cover their own actions and to make US people believe that the battle was impossible. Nobody would ask why they didn't support Custer.

In fact, when the Indian scouts saw the village on Crows Nest, several miles away from the hostile village, they told Custer of their discovery. Custer told them to wait until the night, to begin an attack on June 26, as it was planned. But Indian scouts suddenly saw Sioux scouts on the hills and told Custer that he had been discovered.

Custer was angry. He didn't want to attack in the afternoon, and told the scouts that nobody had seen them. White Man Runs Him and the Crow scouts told him to attack at once. Red Star remembered that the Crow wanted to attack, but Custer didn't want to.

But soon afterwards, Captain Keogh told Custer that Indians had discovered a breadbox that had been forgotten by the pack mule.

Custer then decided to attack at once. He told his officers that he had wanted to attack at dawn, on June 26, 1876, but that the Indian discovery was endangering the whole mission. The attack had to be made at once.

Custer's attack wasn't impossible, as some people continue to say today. It was logical. US general-in-chief Nelson A. Miles, while studying the battle between 1877 and 1890 with White and Indian witnesses and his own experience as an Indian fighter, didn't see any problem in attacking Indians at Little Bighorn.

The lack of organization of the warriors weakened their force. 1'500 warriors wasn't big deal for 647 soldiers with training and long-range rifles (Indians loved short-range rifles, to shoot while riding).

This is the key to understand Little Bighorn. It was NOT a suicidal attack. Not at all.

But 210 soldiers with Cusetr's column fought during the whole battle (June 25, 1876). 400 others with Benteen and Reno didn't fight much, 40 minutes for 170 of them, and no more than 10 minutes for the majority with Benteen. 

How could that happen ?


 BUY THE BEST BOOKS NOW!
The Arikara Narrative of Custer's Campaign and the Battle of the Little Bighorn 

Mercredi 2 mai 2007

Inspired by a love of history and its amazing accounts of human endeavor, model making and dramatic representations of the people, places and things that have shaped our culture.
TERRY'S ORDERS
 

Annual Report of the Secretary of War for 1876, which is House Executive Document 1 for the second session of the Forty-fourth Congress (Serial volume 1742), page 462


Headquarters of the Department of Dakota (In the Field)
Camp at Mouth of Rosebud River, Montana Territory June 22nd, 1876

Lieutenant-Colonel Custer,
7th Calvary

Colonel: The Brigadier-General Commanding directs that, as soon as your regiment can be made ready for the march, you will proceed up the Rosebud in pursuit of the Indians whose trail was discovered by Major Reno a few days since. It is, impossible to give you any definite instructions in regard to this movement, and were it not impossible to do so the Department Commander places too much confidence in your zeal, energy, and ability to wish to impose upon you precise orders which might hamper your action when nearly in contact with the enemy. He will, however, indicate to you his own views of what your action should be, and he desires that you should conform to them unless you shall see sufficient reason for departing from them. He thinks that you should proceed up the Rosebud until you ascertain definitely the direction in which the trail above spoken of leads. Should it be found (as it appears almost certain that it will be found) to turn towards the Little Bighorn, he thinks that you should still proceed southward, perhaps as far as the headwaters of the Tongue, and then turn toward the Little Horn, feeling constantly, however, to your left, so as to preclude the escape of the Indians passing around your left flank.

The column of Colonel Gibbon is now in motion for the mouth of the Big Horn. As soon as it reaches that point will cross the Yellowstone and move up at least as far as the forks of the Big and Little Horns. Of course its future movements must be controlled by circumstances as they arise, but it is hoped that the Indians, if upon the Little Horn, may be so nearly inclosed by the two columns that their escape will be impossible. The Department Commander desires that on your way up the Rosebud you should thoroughly examine the upper part of Tullock's Creek, and that you should endeavor to send a scout through to Colonel Gibbon's command.

The supply-steamer will be pushed up the Big Horn as far as the forks of the river is found to be navigable for that distance, and the Department Commander, who will accompany the column of Colonel Gibbon, desires you to report to him there not later than the expiration of the time for which your troops are rationed, unless in the mean time you receive further orders.

Very respectfully, Your obedient servant,
E. W. Smith, Captain, 18th Infantry A. A. J. G.

GeneralAlfredTerry.jpg

LITTLE BIGHORN CAMPAIGN

mettre des photos en ligne sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus